Updated February 20, 2026
TL;DR: Atlassian forces Opsgenie users to migrate to Jira Service Management by April 5, 2027, creating friction for agile SRE teams. For startups managing 15-25 incidents monthly, the best alternatives balance speed and automation without enterprise overhead. We built incident.io as a Slack-native platform with on-call, AI post-mortems, and status pages unified in one system, operational in hours at $31-45/user/month. PagerDuty provides battle-tested alerting at $21-41/user/month before add-ons. Better Stack combines monitoring and on-call starting at $29/responder. Grafana OnCall's open-source version entered maintenance mode in 2025. Rootly starts at $20/user/month with AI features.
The Opsgenie sunset announcement delivered unwelcome news to thousands of engineering teams. Atlassian requires all users to migrate before April 5th, 2027. For startups running lean SRE teams, this forced migration to Jira Service Management creates an opportunity to modernize your entire incident response workflow, not just swap alerting tools.
Atlassian's migration documentation reveals that alert actions and incident rules don't move automatically, requiring teams to recreate workflows using Jira Automation. Small engineering teams managing 2 AM incidents face compounding overhead. The migration won't transfer fields like Responder roles and Stakeholder filters, requiring incident template reviews post-migration.
For a 50-person startup, the question isn't "Which tool replaces Opsgenie cheapest?" but rather "Which platform eliminates the coordination tax costing us 15 minutes per incident?"
Atlassian's forced Opsgenie migration to Jira Service Management exposes a fundamental philosophy mismatch for SRE teams. JSM's portal-first workflows slow incident response when your team needs speed. Responders must continually switch between two applications, making work done in Jira disconnected from Opsgenie.
One customer captured the frustration with fragmented tools:
"it's a one stop shop for incident management (not just on call rotations like many competitors. Built in and custom automations, great slack integration, automated post mortem generation, jira ticket creation, followup and actions creation, post incident workflows." - Verified user on G2
The review highlights what Opsgenie users lose when forced into JSM: unified incident management where on-call, response coordination, and documentation happen in one place.
For a 50-person startup managing 15-25 incidents monthly, cost-effectiveness means more than license fees. Four criteria define true value:
1. Setup speed and time-to-value
Spike.sh notes that incident.io requires 1-2 days for full setup. Setup time directly translates to engineering hours. Tools requiring weeks of configuration waste valuable resources when your SRE team should be building reliability.
2. Transparent, all-inclusive pricing
Spike's pricing breakdown reveals that separate on-call add-ons mean the price you see isn't what you'll pay for a complete solution. Hidden costs in add-ons for essential features increase TCO significantly.
3. Slack-native workflow reducing coordination overhead
Alert fires in PagerDuty, coordination happens in Slack, tickets get created in Jira, post-mortems get written in Confluence. Every context switch adds cognitive load. The question to ask: Can you run the entire incident without opening a browser?
4. Scalability without complexity
Startups need tools that grow from 50 to 100+ employees without requiring dedicated administrators or complex reconfiguration.
Best for: Teams wanting a unified platform that eliminates tool sprawl with everything in Slack.
Our Pro plan costs $25/user/month with on-call scheduling as a $20/user/month add-on ($45/user/month total), built for teams of 50-500 engineers who value speed over infinite configurability. For earlier-stage teams, our Team plan starts at $19/user/month with on-call as a $12/user/month add-on ($31 total).
Startup fit: Operational in hours
We built incident.io to get teams operational in hours, not weeks. One customer described the implementation experience:
"Incident.io has dramatically improved the experience for calling incidents in our organization... Good support and documentation during implementation has made the transition smooth, and new users have found the product easy enough to grasp that training isn't generally required (the /inc tutorial functionality covers most of the rest)." - Verified user on G2Key features for startups:
/inc commands for assign, escalate, and resolve actionsIntegrations:
We provide extensive integrations with Datadog, AWS CloudWatch, Jira, GitHub, and 30+ platforms. We automatically create incidents from monitoring alerts while syncing follow-up actions to your existing ticketing systems.
Security and compliance:
Our SOC 2 Type II certification and GDPR compliance match Opsgenie's security posture. We support SAML/SCIM for identity management integration.
Pros for startups:
Cons for startups:
Best for: Enterprise-grade alerting with the most extensive integration ecosystem.
PagerDuty's Professional tier costs $21/user/month with annual billing, while Business reaches $41/user/month. The platform provides powerful alerting but costs escalate with add-ons.
Hidden costs to factor:
Analytics, AIOps, and advanced features come with extra fees. Base platform plus AI features, noise reduction, and runbooks can reach $60-80/user/month. AIOps alone adds $699/month.
Pros for startups:
Cons for startups:
Best for: Visual-first monitoring combined with incident management.
Better Stack charges $29/responder/month plus $21/month per 50 monitors. Average annual cost runs about $3,099 with a 60-day money-back guarantee.
Key features:
Pros for startups:
Cons for startups:
Best for: Teams already invested in Grafana observability stack.
Grafana OnCall requires $25,000 minimum annual commit for cloud version. Self-hosted version is free but entered maintenance mode as of March 2025.
Critical update for 2025:
Grafana OnCall OSS will be archived on March 24, 2026. No further feature development will occur, though fixes for critical bugs with CVSS score 7.0+ continue.
Pros for startups:
Cons for startups:
Best for: Teams wanting highly customizable workflow automation.
Rootly starts at $20/user/month. Essentials tier runs $240/user annually, while Scale tier reaches $420/user. Special startup discounts available for companies under 100 employees that raised less than $50M.
Key features:
Pros for startups:
Cons for startups:
| Platform | Starting price | On-call included? | Slack-native? | AI features | Setup time | Security | Startup fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| incident.io | $31/user/mo (Team) or $45/user/mo (Pro) | Add-on for both plans | Yes, full workflow | AI SRE, Scribe, auto post-mortems | Hours to 2 days | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR | High |
| PagerDuty | $21-41/user/mo + add-ons | Yes, basic | Integration only | $699/mo AIOps add-on | 1-2 weeks | SOC 2 | Medium |
| Better Stack | $29/responder | Requires license | No | Basic AI | 2-5 days | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR | Medium-High |
| Grafana OnCall | $25k/year or Free (OSS) | Yes | No | None (maintenance mode) | 1 week | Enterprise | Low (deprecated) |
| Rootly | $20/user/mo | Yes, native | Yes | AI-assisted | 3-7 days | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA | Medium |
Key differentiator for startups: We unify on-call, response, AI investigation, status pages, and post-mortems in Slack, eliminating tool sprawl.
The comparison reveals three tiers:
Tier 1 (High startup fit): incident.io and Better Stack offer operational speed with transparent pricing. We win for teams prioritizing Slack-native workflows and AI automation. Better Stack wins for teams wanting visual monitoring combined with incident management.
Tier 2 (Medium fit): PagerDuty and Rootly serve different needs. PagerDuty provides enterprise reliability but costs escalate with add-ons. Rootly offers deep customization but requires configuration investment.
Tier 3 (Low fit): Grafana OnCall entered maintenance mode, making it unsuitable for long-term foundations.
One customer captured their platform shift:
"I'm new to incident.io since starting on a new job, after many years using Atlassian's Statuspage and PagerDuty. Three things that I believe are done very well in incident.io: integration with other apps and platforms, holistic approach to incident alerting and notifications, and customer/technical support. It's on a very different level (much better) from other vendors." - Rodrigo Q. on G2
For a 50-person startup managing 20 incidents monthly, the business case extends beyond license fees to engineer time reclaimed.
The coordination tax calculation:
Alert fires in PagerDuty, coordination happens in Slack, tickets in Jira, post-mortems in Confluence. Every context switch adds cognitive load. Teams lose 15 minutes per incident to tool sprawl.
Monthly cost: 20 incidents × 15 minutes = 5 hours
Annual cost: 60 hours × $75 SRE rate = $4,500 in wasted coordination time
The post-mortem time savings:
Manual reconstruction wastes 60-90 minutes per incident. Our AI generates post-mortems in 15 minutes for review.
Time saved: 75 minutes (1.25 hours) per incident
Monthly savings: 20 incidents × 1.25 hours × $75/hour = $1,875
Annual savings: $22,500
Combined annual value: $4,500 (coordination) + $22,500 (post-mortems) = $27,000
Real-world MTTR improvements:
Teams using incident.io achieve up to 80% reduction in MTTR. Favor, for example, saw a 37% reduction after implementing the platform. For a team with a 4-hour average incident, that saves 1.48 hours per incident.
Understanding AI SRE vs AI-washing:
True AI incident management platforms act as an AI SRE teammate that investigates issues, identifies root causes, and suggests fixes. Our AI SRE delivers up to 80% reduction in MTTR by analyzing deployment history, error patterns, and system behaviors to generate fix pull requests automatically.
One customer captured the practical impact:
"The ease of use of the system within Slack has been great for people in the company and it is incredibly easy to collaborate on incidents as a result. The speed at which new features are rolled out is great and the level of support we get is fantastic." - Marc V. on G2
Sample ROI calculation for 50-user startup:
| Category | Current state | With incident.io Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly licenses | Opsgenie + tools: ~$1,800 | Pro $45 × 50: $2,250 |
| License delta | - | +$450/mo |
| Engineer time saved | Baseline | 30 hrs/mo × $75 = $2,250 |
| Net monthly | $1,800 cost | $2,250 cost - $2,250 savings = $0 net |
| Annual position | $21,600 | $27,000 time value reclaimed |
Atlassian's April 5, 2027 deadline means you need a migration plan now. We recommend a 2-4 week parallel run to validate your new setup.
Days 1-5: Audit and import
Audit your existing Opsgenie configuration: on-call schedules and rotation patterns, escalation policies, service definitions and ownership, integration endpoints, and alert routing rules.
Use our migration tools from Opsgenie to import schedules and configurations. We provide importing schedules and escalation policies documentation.
Setup steps:
Days 6-12: Parallel run
One customer completed full rollout in one month, including a two-week trial. Configure monitoring tools to send alerts to BOTH systems. Run side-by-side comparison. Train your team on /inc commands using our shortcuts cheatsheet. Test workflows in non-production using fake incidents to sandbox.
Days 13-14: Full cutover
Schedule cutover during low-traffic period. Communicate timeline to stakeholders. Create rollback plan. Disable Opsgenie alert routing but keep as read-only backup. Switch all monitoring alerts to incident.io only.
"For our engineers working on incident, the primary interface for incident.io is slack. It's where we collaborate and where we were gathering to handle incident before introducing incident.io... That's where incident.io really shines: it allows to seamlessly nudge or suggest actions." - Alexandre R. on G2
Post-migration (Days 15-30):
Continue monitoring for 2 weeks. Gather team feedback. Optimize workflows. Complete any missing configuration. Most teams become operational quickly due to our opinionated defaults and Slack-native design requiring minimal training.
The Opsgenie sunset creates a forcing function to modernize your incident management. Don't just replace one alerting tool with another. We built incident.io to eliminate tool sprawl by unifying on-call, status pages, and automated post-mortem workflows in one system.
For startups managing 15-25 incidents monthly with lean SRE teams, the choice comes down to operational speed versus feature breadth. We deliver fastest time-to-value with Slack-native workflows requiring zero training. PagerDuty provides enterprise reliability at enterprise cost. Better Stack combines monitoring and incidents for visual-first teams. Rootly offers deep customization for teams willing to invest configuration time.
The business case is clear when you calculate the coordination tax. Manual post-mortem reconstruction wastes 60-90 minutes per incident. For a 50-person team, that's $27,000 annually in reclaimed engineer time.
Schedule a demo to see how incident.io handles your specific migration path from Opsgenie.
MTTR (Mean Time to Resolution): The average time from when an incident is detected until it's completely resolved and systems return to normal operation. MTTR equals total time from start to resolution, divided by frequency.
On-call rotation: A schedule determining which engineer responds to alerts and incidents at any given time. Easily rotate schedules and switch shifts to maintain round-the-clock coverage.
Slack-native: An incident management approach where the entire incident lifecycle happens within Slack using commands and workflows, eliminating the need to open browser tabs or switch tools during high-stress incidents.
AI SRE: An AI-powered virtual teammate that autonomously investigates incidents by analyzing code changes, telemetry data, and past incidents to identify root causes and suggest fixes, going beyond text summarization to actual problem-solving.


Blog about combining incident.io's incident context with Apono's dynamic provisioning, the new integration ensures secure, just-in-time access for on-call engineers, thereby speeding up incident response and enhancing security.
Brian Hanson
We break down ITIL 5's governance framework and what it means for teams using AI in incident response. For incident management, it addresses questions like: Who's accountable when an AI-suggested remediation backfires? How do you audit AI-generated updates?
Chris Evans
When AI can scaffold out entire features in seconds and you have multiple agents all working in parallel on different tasks, a ninety-second feedback loop kills your flow state completely. We've recently invested in dramatically speeding up our developer feedback cycles, cutting some by 95% to address this. In this post we’ll share what that journey looked like, why we did it and what it taught us about building for the AI era.
Rory BainReady for modern incident management? Book a call with one of our experts today.
