In the world of incident management, learning can be hugely impactful.
But let’s take a quick pause. No, I don’t mean that you should abandon all of your other priorities and focus on learning from incidents over everything else. Remember, at the end of the day, your focus should be on delivering value to customers, not getting caught up in an endless maze of metrics.
All of that said, learning from your incident metrics is undoubtedly an important marker of a maturing incident response function.
It’s all very nuanced.
Incident reporting metrics can play a crucial role in measuring and enhancing your organization's ability to address all sorts of incidents like misconfigurations, hardware failure, software bugs, and more.
And by focusing on the right indicators, teams can build an effective process to decrease incident management risks, optimize response strategies, and strengthen overall system resilience.
In this article, I’m going to share seven incident reporting metrics that your organization can focus on to help gain a better understanding of your incident response processes, and highlight any areas of improvement or opportunities for investment.
I’ll also share how incident.io’s Insights dashboard can help you glean many of these insights out-of-the-box, with pre-built dashboards that show a whole host of incident response metrics.
In a nutshell, incident reporting involves systematically documenting and analyzing events that disrupt an organization's normal operations or pose security risks. These incidents can range from cyberattacks to equipment malfunctions, data breaches, or human errors.
A well-structured incident report provides valuable insights into the nature of these occurrences and helps identify patterns that may indicate systemic vulnerabilities. It also serves as a useful tool for prioritizing resources and implementing effective countermeasures. By implementing reporting methods, businesses can improve their incident response.
Now let's explore how incident reporting metrics fit into the broader context of the response process.
Incident reports help paint a clear picture of each incident. By tracking and analyzing incident metrics, teams can identify trends, assess their impact on operations, and fine-tune their approach to mitigating threats.
For instance, consider an organization experiencing frequent Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks. Analyzing the incidents' patterns through detailed reporting may reveal that peak occurrences coincide with high-traffic periods or particular regions.
These insights can allow responders to proactively allocate resources or implement targeted countermeasures during those times.
Leveraging these data-driven insights strengthens your organization's security posture while enabling you to keep improving your response process — ensuring you're always one step ahead of potential incidents.
The metrics here can provide a pretty comprehensive picture of how your response processes are tracking. They can serve as a solid foundation for any business looking to optimize its incident reporting, and highlight any problem areas, functions that you may want to invest resources in, and more.
Uptime, often measured as a percentage, represents the reliability and availability of your systems.
It directly impacts end-user experience and overall productivity. By tracking uptime in conjunction with incident status data, you can better understand how disruptions affect system performance.
For example, suppose your organization's e-commerce platform experiences frequent downtime during peak business hours. You also find multiple incidents involving server overload. Analyzing the correlation between these incidents and reduced uptime can alert you of areas needing improvements or additional security measures.
Maintaining high uptime should be a top goal when addressing all incident types — ensuring not only customer satisfaction but also safeguarding revenue streams by minimizing disruptions in critical services.
A win-win for everyone!
The escalation rate refers to the percentage of incidents that require intervention from higher-level support teams or specialized experts for incident resolution.
A high escalation rate can indicate a lack of preparedness, inadequate training, or insufficient resources at the lower support levels.
For instance, if your IT helpdesk consistently escalates security-related issues to your dedicated cybersecurity team rather than resolving them internally, it may signal a need for additional training in basic security protocols.
Organizations should invest in continuous education and upskilling initiatives to optimize response efforts and minimize disruptions caused by escalating incidents unnecessarily. Empower your staff with essential knowledge and free up specialized teams to focus on more complex challenges.
Cost per ticket is the average expense incurred by an organization for handling individual support desk or helpdesk tickets. They are generated for each reported incident. This metric considers factors such as personnel time, infrastructure costs, and any tools or resources needed to resolve issues. By keeping a close eye on cost per ticket trends, organizations can identify opportunities to optimize their response strategies and allocate resources more efficiently.
For example, if your analysis reveals that certain incidents consistently have higher costs due to lengthy resolution processes or specialized equipment requirements, you may need to reassess your approach to addressing these challenges.
Streamlining processes and investing in preventive measures can reduce the overall impact of future incidents on your budget while also ensuring a faster response time. The bottom line is that it benefits both your customers' experience and business operations.
Average incident response time is the amount of time that passes between reporting an incident and addressing or resolving it. By monitoring the average time taken to respond effectively, you can identify bottlenecks in communication, staffing issues, or areas that require additional resources.
If specific types of incidents consistently have longer response times than others due to inadequate tools or expertise among frontline staff members, this insight highlights opportunities for improvement.
To optimize average incident response time and ensure prompt resolution, prioritize training programs focusing on common problem areas while investing in tools that streamline team communication channels. Faster resolution leads to greater customer satisfaction and reduced potential damages resulting from prolonged disruptions.
The mean time to acknowledge (MTTA) is the average time it takes for a support or incident response team to recognize and acknowledge an incoming incident report. This metric is crucial because it reflects your organization's ability to promptly initiate the resolution process, which can significantly impact overall recovery efforts.
MTTA data can identify specific incidents that consistently take longer than others for acknowledgment. Usually, this is due to inadequate monitoring processes or miscommunication between teams.
To optimize MTTA performance, invest in robust monitoring tools and establish clear communication protocols within your teams. By ensuring swift acknowledgment of incidents, you're setting up a strong foundation for timely resolutions while minimizing potential damage caused by delays in addressing critical issues.
Mean time to resolution (MTTR) is how long an incident response team takes to fully resolve and close an issue from the moment it's first reported.
You may find specific types of incidents consistently have longer MTTRs due to complex recovery procedures or a lack of expertise among support staff members. Therefore, you need targeted training programs or better resource allocation decisions.
Note that both average response time and MTTR focus on resolution time in different ways. Average incident response time refers to a simple average — adding up all individual incident response times and dividing by the total number of incidents.
On the other hand, MTTR takes into account not only successful resolutions but also factors like recurring or unresolved issues. MTTR focuses on quantifying overall effectiveness in resolving problems rather than just measuring raw durations.
Incidents over time is a metric that tracks the number of reported incidents within a specific time period, such as days, weeks, or months.
For example, if your data analysis reveals an increasing trend in cybersecurity incidents targeting your organization's web applications during weekends or holidays when staffing levels are lower than usual, you may need to reevaluate resource allocation strategies for those times.
The underlying causes behind the fluctuations in these numbers can inform organizations on how to continually strengthen their defenses and infrastructure.
Like I said at the beginning, these seven metrics can help you gain a better understanding of how your incident response processes are performing overall. But how exactly do you go about gathering these metrics?
This is where incident.io’s Insights dashboard comes in.
With it, teams can glean many relevant and insightful incident response metrics, allowing them to make meaningful changes to how they structure their teams, organize on-call rotations, and even the processes they have in place.
The best part about it? Many of these dashboards are pre-built, so you can jump right in and analyze your response metrics without any overhead. Here are just a few of the metrics you can track right out of the box:
If you’re interested in seeing how Insights work and how its metrics can fit seamlessly into your incident response tracking, be sure to contact us to schedule a custom demo.
Enter your details to receive our monthly newsletter, filled with incident related insights to help you in your day-to-day!
Using DORA metrics deployment frequency to measure your DevOps team's ability to deliver customer value
By using DORA's deployment frequency metric, organizations can improve customer impact and product reliablity.
Learning from incidents is not the goal
Learning from incidents is a hot topic within the software industry, but the goal is not for organisations to learn from incidents: it’s for them to be better, more successful businesses.
Trust shouldn’t start at zero
Whenever someone new joins your team, folks tend to default to a trust level of zero. Here's why that's a big mistake.